Paper detail

Invisible Backdoor Attacks Using Data Poisoning in the Frequency Domain

With the broad application of deep neural networks (DNNs), backdoor attacks have gradually attracted attention. Backdoor attacks are insidious, and poisoned models perform well on benign samples and are only triggered when given specific inputs, which cause the neural network to produce incorrect outputs. The state-of-the-art backdoor attack work is implemented by data poisoning, i.e., the attacker injects poisoned samples into the dataset, and the models trained with that dataset are infected with the backdoor. However, most of the triggers used in the current study are fixed patterns patched on a small fraction of an image and are often clearly mislabeled, which is easily detected by humans or defense methods such as Neural Cleanse and SentiNet. Also, it's difficult to be learned by DNNs without mislabeling, as they may ignore small patterns. In this paper, we propose a generalized backdoor attack method based on the frequency domain, which can implement backdoor implantation without mislabeling and accessing the training process. It is invisible to human beings and able to evade the commonly used defense methods. We evaluate our approach in the no-label and clean-label cases on three datasets (CIFAR-10, STL-10, and GTSRB) with two popular scenarios (self-supervised learning and supervised learning). The results show our approach can achieve a high attack success rate (above 90%) on all the tasks without significant performance degradation on main tasks. Also, we evaluate the bypass performance of our approach for different kinds of defenses, including the detection of training data (i.e., Activation Clustering), the preprocessing of inputs (i.e., Filtering), the detection of inputs (i.e., SentiNet), and the detection of models (i.e., Neural Cleanse). The experimental results demonstrate that our approach shows excellent robustness to such defenses.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.