Paper detail

Invariants in Co-polar Interferometry: an Abelian Gauge Theory

An $N$-element interferometer measures correlations among pairs of array elements. Closure invariants associated with closed loops among array elements are immune to multiplicative, element-based ("local") corruptions that occur in these measurements. Till recently, it has been unclear how a complete set of independent invariants can be analytically determined. We view the local, element-based corruptions in co-polar correlations as gauge tranformations belonging to the gauge group $\textrm{GL}(1,\mathbb{C})$. Closure quantities are then naturally gauge invariant. We use this to provide a simple and effective formalism, and identify the complete set of independent closure invariants from co-polar interferometric correlations using only quantities defined on $(N-1)(N-2)/2$ elementary and independent triangular loops. The $(N-1)(N-2)/2$ closure phases and $N(N-3)/2$ closure amplitudes (totaling $N^2-3N+1$ real invariants), familiar in astronomical interferometry, naturally emerge from this formalism, which unifies what has required separate treatments until now. We do not require auto-correlations, but can easily include them if reliably measured. This unified view clarifies issues relating to noise and inference of object model parameters. It also allows us to extend the rule of parallel transport associated with Pancharatnam phase in optics to apply to amplitudes as well. The framework presented here extends to $\textrm{GL}(2,\mathbb{C}$) for full polarimetric interferometry as presented in a companion paper, which generalizes and clarifies earlier work. Our findings are relevant to state of the art co-polar and full polarimetric very long baseline interferometry measurements to determine features very near the event horizons of blackholes at the centers of M87, Centaurus~A, and the Milky Way.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors5 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.