Researcher profile

Rajaram Nityananda

Rajaram Nityananda contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
12topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Exactly solved model of a one dimensional self gravitating system

A model one-dimensional self consistent steady state collisionless self-gravitating system in which all the particles have the same energy is presented. This has the remarkable property that the position and velocity of the particles orbiting in their own self consistent potential are given exactly, in terms of time, by the truncations of sine and cosine functions to the first two terms in their respective Taylor series. The potential and density also have simple analytic expressions in terms of time as parameter. It is not being claimed that this system has any direct astronomical application. However, it does motivate a conjecture about the behaviour of the density, potential, and orbits near caustics in simulations of cold collisionless dark matter. It is a rather surprising result which might interest practitioners of stellar dynamics and serve as an elementary example in teaching the subject.

preprint2022arXiv

Invariants in Co-polar Interferometry: an Abelian Gauge Theory

An $N$-element interferometer measures correlations among pairs of array elements. Closure invariants associated with closed loops among array elements are immune to multiplicative, element-based ("local") corruptions that occur in these measurements. Till recently, it has been unclear how a complete set of independent invariants can be analytically determined. We view the local, element-based corruptions in co-polar correlations as gauge tranformations belonging to the gauge group $\textrm{GL}(1,\mathbb{C})$. Closure quantities are then naturally gauge invariant. We use this to provide a simple and effective formalism, and identify the complete set of independent closure invariants from co-polar interferometric correlations using only quantities defined on $(N-1)(N-2)/2$ elementary and independent triangular loops. The $(N-1)(N-2)/2$ closure phases and $N(N-3)/2$ closure amplitudes (totaling $N^2-3N+1$ real invariants), familiar in astronomical interferometry, naturally emerge from this formalism, which unifies what has required separate treatments until now. We do not require auto-correlations, but can easily include them if reliably measured. This unified view clarifies issues relating to noise and inference of object model parameters. It also allows us to extend the rule of parallel transport associated with Pancharatnam phase in optics to apply to amplitudes as well. The framework presented here extends to $\textrm{GL}(2,\mathbb{C}$) for full polarimetric interferometry as presented in a companion paper, which generalizes and clarifies earlier work. Our findings are relevant to state of the art co-polar and full polarimetric very long baseline interferometry measurements to determine features very near the event horizons of blackholes at the centers of M87, Centaurus~A, and the Milky Way.

preprint2022arXiv

Invariants in Polarimetric Interferometry: a non-Abelian Gauge Theory

The discovery of magnetic fields close to the M87 black hole using Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) by the Event Horizon Telescope collaboration utilized the novel concept of "closure traces", that are immune to element-based aberrations. We take a fundamentally new approach to this promising tool of polarimetric VLBI, using ideas from the geometric phase and gauge theories. The multiplicative distortion of polarized signals at the individual elements are represented as gauge transformations by general $2\times 2$ complex matrices, so the closure traces now appear as gauge-invariant quantities. We apply this formalism to polarimetric interferometry and generalize it to any number of interferometer elements. Our approach goes beyond existing studies in the following respects: (1) we use triangular combinations of correlations as basic building blocks of invariants, (2) we use well-known symmetry properties of the Lorentz group to transparently identify a complete and independent set of invariants, and (3) we do not need auto-correlations, which are susceptible to large systematic biases, and therefore unreliable. This set contains all the information, immune to corruption, available in the interferometer measurements, thus providing important robust constraints for interferometric studies.

preprint2015arXiv

Strong constraints on magnetized white dwarfs surpassing the Chandrasekhar mass limit

We show that recently proposed white dwarf models with masses well in excess of the Chandrasekhar limit, based on modifying the equation of state by a super-strong magnetic field in the centre, are very far from equilibrium because of the neglect of Lorentz forces. An upper bound on the central magnetic fields, from a spherically averaged hydrostatic equation, is much smaller than the values assumed. Robust estimates of the Lorentz forces are also made without assuming spherical averaging. These again bear out the results obtained from a spherically averaged model. In our assessment, these estimates rule out the possibility that magnetic tension could change the situation in favor of larger magnetic fields. We conclude that such super-Chandrasekhar models are unphysical and exploration of their astrophysical consequences is premature. Erratum : We correct certain numerical estimates made in our paper. This correction however does not alter the conclusion that when Lorentz forces are taken into account the super-massive white dwarf models, obtained simply by modifying the equation of state in presence of a super-strong magnetic field in the centre, fail to be in equilibrium.

preprint2014arXiv

A critique of recent semi-classical spin-half quantum plasma theories

Certain recent semi-classical theories of spin-half quantum plasmas are examined with regard to their internal consistency, physical applicability and relevance to fusion, astrophysical and condensed matter plasmas. It is shown that the derivations and some of the results obtained in these theories are internally inconsistent and contradict well-established principles of quantum and statistical mechanics, especially in their treatment of fermions and spin. Claims of large semi-classical effects of spin magnetic moments that could dominate the plasma dynamics are found to be invalid both for single-particles and collectively. Larmor moments dominate at high temperature while spin moments cancel due to Pauli blocking at low temperatures. Explicit numerical estimates from a variety of plasmas are provided to demonstrate that spin effects are indeed much smaller than many neglected classical effects. The analysis presented suggests that the aforementioned `Spin Quantum Hydrodynamic' theories are not relevant to conventional laboratory or astrophysical plasmas.

preprint2013arXiv

A critique of recent theories of spin half quantum plasmas

In this Letter certain fundamental physics issues relating to recent theories of so-called `spin quantum plasmas' are examined. It is shown that the derivations and some of the results obtained in these theories contradict well-established principles of quantum mechanics, especially in their treatment of fermions and spin. The analysis presented suggests that the aforementioned theories do not apply for any range of temperatures at the stated densities and furthermore fail to make any experimentally accessible and testable predictions.