Paper detail

Intuitive Physics Guided Exploration for Sample Efficient Sim2real Transfer

Physics-based reinforcement learning tasks can benefit from simplified physics simulators as they potentially allow near-optimal policies to be learned in simulation. However, such simulators require the latent factors (e.g. mass, friction coefficient etc.) of the associated objects and other environment-specific factors (e.g. wind speed, air density etc.) to be accurately specified, without which, it could take considerable additional learning effort to adapt the learned simulation policy to the real environment. As such a complete specification can be impractical, in this paper, we instead, focus on learning task-specific estimates of latent factors which allow the approximation of real world trajectories in an ideal simulation environment. Specifically, we propose two new concepts: a) action grouping - the idea that certain types of actions are closely associated with the estimation of certain latent factors, and; b) partial grounding - the idea that simulation of task-specific dynamics may not need precise estimation of all the latent factors. We first introduce intuitive action groupings based on human physics knowledge and experience, which is then used to design novel strategies for interacting with the real environment. Next, we describe how prior knowledge of a task in a given environment can be used to extract the relative importance of different latent factors, and how this can be used to inform partial grounding, which enables efficient learning of the task in any arbitrary environment. We demonstrate our approach in a range of physics based tasks, and show that it achieves superior performance relative to other baselines, using only a limited number of real-world interactions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.