Paper detail

Intrinsic Universal Measurements of Non-linear Embeddings

A basic problem in machine learning is to find a mapping $f$ from a low dimensional latent space $\mathcal{Y}$ to a high dimensional observation space $\mathcal{X}$. Modern tools such as deep neural networks are capable to represent general non-linear mappings. A learner can easily find a mapping which perfectly fits all the observations. However, such a mapping is often not considered as good, because it is not simple enough and can overfit. How to define simplicity? We try to make a formal definition on the amount of information imposed by a non-linear mapping $f$. Intuitively, we measure the local discrepancy between the pullback geometry and the intrinsic geometry of the latent space. Our definition is based on information geometry and is independent of the empirical observations, nor specific parameterizations. We prove its basic properties and discuss relationships with related machine learning methods.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.