Paper detail

Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in nickel: An GGA+U study

The electronic structure and intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity of nickel have been calculated based on the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) plus on-site Coulomb interaction (GGA+U) scheme. It is found that the intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity ($σ_{xy}^H$) obtained from the GGA+U calculations with $U = 1.9$ eV and $J=1.2$ eV, is in nearly perfect agreement with that measured recently at low temperatures while, in contrast, the $σ_{xy}^H$ from the GGA calculations is about 100% larger than the measured one. This indicates that, as for the other spin-orbit interaction (SOI)-induced phenomena in 3$d$ itinerant magnets such as the orbital magnetic magnetization and magnetocrystalline anisotropy, the on-site electron-electron correlation, though moderate only, should be taken into account properly in order to get the correct anomalous Hall conductivity. The intrinsic $σ_{xy}^H$ and the number of valence electrons ($N_e$) have also been calculated as a function of the Fermi energy ($E_F$). A sign change is predicted at $E_F = -0.38$ eV ($N_e = 9.57$), and this explain qualitatively why the theoretical and experimental $σ_{xy}^H$ values for Fe and Co are positive. It is also predicted that fcc Ni$_{(1-x)}$Co(Fe,Cu)$_x$ alloys with $x$ being small, would also have the negative $σ_{xy}^H$ with the magnitude being in the range of $500\sim 1400$ $Ω^{-1}$cm$^{-1}$. The most pronounced effect of including the on-site Coulomb interaction is that all the $d$-dominant bands are lowered in energy relative to the $E_F$ by about 0.3 eV, and consequently, the small minority spin X$_2$ hole pocket disappears. The presence of the small X$_2$ hole pocket in the GGA calculations is attributed to be responsible for the large discrepancy in the $σ_{xy}^H$ between theory and experiment.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.