Source author record

Huei-Ru Fuh

Huei-Ru Fuh appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2012arXiv

Anomalous and spin Hall effects in hcp cobalt from GGA + U calculations

We have calculated the intrinsic anomalous and spin Hall conductivities, spin and orbital magnetic moments and also spin polarization of Hall currentsin hexagonal cobalt within the density functional theory with the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) plus on-site Coulomb interaction (GGA+$U$). The accurate all-electron full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method is used. We find that the anomalous Hall conductivity (AHC) ($σ_{xy}^A$) and orbital magnetic moment ($m_o$) of cobalt with the magnetization being along the c-axis ($m//c$) calculated in the GGA+$U$ scheme with $U = 1.6$ eV and $J = 0.9$ eV agree rather well with the corresponding experimental values while, in contrast, the $σ_{xy}^A$ and $m_o$ from the GGA calculations are significantly smaller than the measured ones. This suggests that moderate $U = 1.6$ eV and $J = 0.9$ eV are appropriate for Co metals. The calculated AHC and spin Hall conductivity (SHC) ($σ^S$) are highly anisotropic, and the ratio of the Hall conductivity for $m//c$ to that for the magnetization being in-plane ($m//ab$) from the GGA+$U$ calculations, is $\sim$16.0 for the AHC and $\sim$6.0 for the SHC. For $m//c$, the spin-up and spin-down Hall currents are found to flow in the same direction. The magnitude of the calculated Hall current spin polarization ($P^H$) is large and $P^H = -0.61$. Remarkably, for $m//ab$, the spin-up and spin-down Hall currents are predicted to flow in the opposite directions. This indicates that the Hall current contains both spin-polarized charge current and pure spin current, resulting in the magnitude of the Hall current spin polarization ($P^H = -1.59$) being larger than 1.0.

preprint2011arXiv

Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in nickel: An GGA+U study

The electronic structure and intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity of nickel have been calculated based on the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) plus on-site Coulomb interaction (GGA+U) scheme. It is found that the intrinsic anomalous Hall conductivity ($σ_{xy}^H$) obtained from the GGA+U calculations with $U = 1.9$ eV and $J=1.2$ eV, is in nearly perfect agreement with that measured recently at low temperatures while, in contrast, the $σ_{xy}^H$ from the GGA calculations is about 100% larger than the measured one. This indicates that, as for the other spin-orbit interaction (SOI)-induced phenomena in 3$d$ itinerant magnets such as the orbital magnetic magnetization and magnetocrystalline anisotropy, the on-site electron-electron correlation, though moderate only, should be taken into account properly in order to get the correct anomalous Hall conductivity. The intrinsic $σ_{xy}^H$ and the number of valence electrons ($N_e$) have also been calculated as a function of the Fermi energy ($E_F$). A sign change is predicted at $E_F = -0.38$ eV ($N_e = 9.57$), and this explain qualitatively why the theoretical and experimental $σ_{xy}^H$ values for Fe and Co are positive. It is also predicted that fcc Ni$_{(1-x)}$Co(Fe,Cu)$_x$ alloys with $x$ being small, would also have the negative $σ_{xy}^H$ with the magnitude being in the range of $500\sim 1400$ $Ω^{-1}$cm$^{-1}$. The most pronounced effect of including the on-site Coulomb interaction is that all the $d$-dominant bands are lowered in energy relative to the $E_F$ by about 0.3 eV, and consequently, the small minority spin X$_2$ hole pocket disappears. The presence of the small X$_2$ hole pocket in the GGA calculations is attributed to be responsible for the large discrepancy in the $σ_{xy}^H$ between theory and experiment.