Paper detail

Interpretation of the $Ω_c \to π^+ Ω(2012) \to π^+(\bar{K} Ξ)$ relative to $Ω_c \to π^+\bar{K} Ξ$ from the $Ω(2012)$ molecular perspective

We present a mechanism for $Ω_c \to π^+ Ω(2012)$ production through an external emission Cabibbo favored weak decay mode, where the $Ω(2012)$ is dynamically generated from the interaction of $\bar{K}Ξ^*(1530)$, $ηΩ$, with $\bar{K}Ξ$ as the main decay channel. The $Ω(2012)$ decays later to $\bar{K}Ξ$ in this picture, with results compatible with Belle data. The picture has as a consequence that one can evaluate the direct decay $Ω_c^0 \to π^+K^- Ξ^0$ and the decay $Ω_c^0 \to π^+\bar{K} Ξ^*$, $π^+ηΩ$ with direct coupling of $\bar{K}Ξ^*$ and $ηΩ$ to $K^- Ξ^0$. We show that, within uncertainties and using data from a recent Belle measurement, all these three channels account for about (12-20)\% of the total $Ω_c \to π^+K^- Ξ^0$ decay rate. The consistency of the molecular picture with all the data is established by showing that $Ω_c \to Ξ^0 \bar{K}^{*0} \to Ξ^0K^- π^+$ together with $Ω_c \to π^+ Ω^* \to π^+K^- Ξ^0 $ account for about 85\% of the total $Ω_c \to π^+K^- Ξ^0 $.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.