Paper detail

Interpretable rainfall modelling reveals rapid reorganisation of Amazonian rainfall under vegetation loss

Understanding how vegetation loss alters rainfall remains a major challenge in climate and hydrological science, as deforestation modifies precipitation through heterogeneous, seasonal and nonlinear land-atmosphere feedbacks. Existing models struggle to capture these dynamics: convection is parameterised at coarse scales, tipping behaviour is poorly constrained, and rainfall-deforestation analyses are limited to multi-decadal timescales. Therefore, many approaches resolve correlations rather than causal effects, limiting our ability to anticipate hydrological disruption. Using a neural-network model for hourly rainfall prediction, combined with pathway diagnostics and sensitivity analyses, we examine how vegetation perturbations reorganise rainfall across space, intensity regimes, and timescales under deforestation. We assess whether the model captures physically consistent dependencies linking vegetation, atmospheric state, and precipitation, and whether sustained canopy loss induces threshold behaviour. The model accurately predicts rainfall occurrence and intensity (Spearman = 0.84, F1 = 0.93, ROC-AUC = 0.98) and learns temporally ordered dependencies aligned with ecohydrological theory. Sensitivity analyses reveal rapid, asymmetric responses to vegetation loss: heavy rainfall (20-50 mm/h) declines by up to 7% under sustained deforestation, while light rainfall (0.1-1 mm/h) increases by 4%. Rainfall entropy rises by 1.3%, and dry-season intensity increases by 0.3-0.5% per 0.5% forest-cover loss, with strongest impacts in the north-western Amazon and Andean foothills. Threshold analysis reveals a sharp decline in precipitating area fraction after 2-3 months of sustained vegetation change in sensitive regions. These results demonstrate that data-driven approaches uncover process-relevant land-atmosphere coupling and highlight growing hydrological vulnerability in the Amazon.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.