Paper detail

Interdependent networks with correlated degrees of mutually dependent nodes

We study a problem of failure of two interdependent networks in the case of correlated degrees of mutually dependent nodes. We assume that both networks (A and B) have the same number of nodes $N$ connected by the bidirectional dependency links establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the nodes of the two networks in a such a way that the mutually dependent nodes have the same number of connectivity links, i.e. their degrees coincide. This implies that both networks have the same degree distribution $P(k)$. We call such networks correspondently coupled networks (CCN). We assume that the nodes in each network are randomly connected. We define the mutually connected clusters and the mutual giant component as in earlier works on randomly coupled interdependent networks and assume that only the nodes which belong to the mutual giant component remain functional. We assume that initially a $1-p$ fraction of nodes are randomly removed due to an attack or failure and find analytically, for an arbitrary $P(k)$, the fraction of nodes $μ(p)$ which belong to the mutual giant component. We find that the system undergoes a percolation transition at certain fraction $p=p_c$ which is always smaller than the $p_c$ for randomly coupled networks with the same $P(k)$. We also find that the system undergoes a first order transition at $p_c>0$ if $P(k)$ has a finite second moment. For the case of scale free networks with $2<λ\leq 3$, the transition becomes a second order transition. Moreover, if $λ<3$ we find $p_c=0$ as in percolation of a single network. For $λ=3$ we find an exact analytical expression for $p_c>0$. Finally, we find that the robustness of CCN increases with the broadness of their degree distribution.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.