Source author record

Gabriel A. Cwilich

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
3topics
3close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2016arXiv

Interdependent Lattice Networks in High Dimensions

We study the mutual percolation of two interdependent lattice networks ranging from two to seven dimensions, denoted as DD. We impose that the length of interdependent links connecting nodes in the two lattices be less than or equal to a certain value, rr. For each value of DD and rr, we find the mutual percolation threshold, pc[D,r]p_c[D,r] below which the system completely collapses through a cascade of failures following an initial destruction of a fraction (1−p) (1-p) of the nodes in one of the lattices. We find that for each dimension, D<6D<6, there is a value of r=rI>1r=r_I>1 such that for r≥rIr\geq r_I the cascading failures occur as a discontinuous first order transition, while for r<rIr<r_I the system undergoes a continuous second order transition, as in the classical percolation theory. Remarkably, for D=6D=6, rI=1r_I=1 which is the same as in random regular (RR) graphs with the same degree (coordination number) of nodes. We also find that in all dimensions, the interdependent lattices reach maximal vulnerability (maximal pc[D,r]p_c[D,r]) at a distance r=rmax>rIr=r_{max}>r_I, and for r>rmaxr>r_{max} the vulnerability starts to decrease as r→∞r\to\infty. However the decrease becomes less significant as DD increases and pc[D,rmax]−pc[D,∞]p_c[D,r_{max}]-p_c[D,\infty] decreases exponentially with DD. We also investigate the dependence of pc[D,r]p_c[D,r] on the system size as well as how the nature of the transition changes as the number of lattice sites, N→∞N\to\infty.

preprint2010arXiv

Interdependent networks with correlated degrees of mutually dependent nodes

We study a problem of failure of two interdependent networks in the case of correlated degrees of mutually dependent nodes. We assume that both networks (A and B) have the same number of nodes NN connected by the bidirectional dependency links establishing a one-to-one correspondence between the nodes of the two networks in a such a way that the mutually dependent nodes have the same number of connectivity links, i.e. their degrees coincide. This implies that both networks have the same degree distribution P(k)P(k). We call such networks correspondently coupled networks (CCN). We assume that the nodes in each network are randomly connected. We define the mutually connected clusters and the mutual giant component as in earlier works on randomly coupled interdependent networks and assume that only the nodes which belong to the mutual giant component remain functional. We assume that initially a 1−p1-p fraction of nodes are randomly removed due to an attack or failure and find analytically, for an arbitrary P(k)P(k), the fraction of nodes μ(p)μ(p) which belong to the mutual giant component. We find that the system undergoes a percolation transition at certain fraction p=pcp=p_c which is always smaller than the pcp_c for randomly coupled networks with the same P(k)P(k). We also find that the system undergoes a first order transition at pc>0p_c>0 if P(k)P(k) has a finite second moment. For the case of scale free networks with 2<λ≤32<λ\leq 3, the transition becomes a second order transition. Moreover, if λ<3λ<3 we find pc=0p_c=0 as in percolation of a single network. For λ=3λ=3 we find an exact analytical expression for pc>0p_c>0. Finally, we find that the robustness of CCN increases with the broadness of their degree distribution.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.