Paper detail

Interactions between Intrinsic and Stimulus-Evoked Activity in Recurrent Neural Networks

Trial-to-trial variability is an essential feature of neural responses, but its source is a subject of active debate. Response variability (Mast and Victor, 1991; Arieli et al., 1995 & 1996; Anderson et al., 2000 & 2001; Kenet et al., 2003; Petersen et al., 2003a & b; Fiser, Chiu and Weliky, 2004; MacLean et al., 2005; Yuste et al., 2005; Vincent et al., 2007) is often treated as random noise, generated either by other brain areas, or by stochastic processes within the circuitry being studied. We call such sources of variability external to stress the independence of this form of noise from activity driven by the stimulus. Variability can also be generated internally by the same network dynamics that generates responses to a stimulus. How can we distinguish between external and internal sources of response variability? Here we show that internal sources of variability interact nonlinearly with stimulus-induced activity, and this interaction yields a suppression of noise in the evoked state. This provides a theoretical basis and potential mechanism for the experimental observation that, in many brain areas, stimuli cause significant suppression of neuronal variability (Werner and Mountcastle, 1963; Fortier, Smith and Kalaska, 1993; Anderson et al., 2000; Friedrich and Laurent, 2004; Churchland et al., 2006; Finn, Priebe and Ferster, 2007; Mitchell, Sundberg and Reynolds, 2007; Churchland et al., 2009). The combined theoretical and experimental results suggest that internally generated activity is a significant contributor to response variability in neural circuits.