Paper detail

Insect cyborgs: Bio-mimetic feature generators improve machine learning accuracy on limited data

Machine learning (ML) classifiers always benefit from more informative input features. We seek to auto-generate stronger feature sets in order to address the difficulty that ML methods often experience given limited training data. A wide range of biological neural nets (BNNs) excel at fast learning, implying that they are adept at extracting informative features. We can thus look to BNNs for tools to improve ML performance in this low-data regime. The insect olfactory network learns new odors very rapidly, by means of three key elements: A competitive inhibition layer; a high-dimensional sparse plastic layer; and Hebbian updates of synaptic weights. In this work, we deployed MothNet, a computational model of the insect olfactory network, as an automatic feature generator: Attached as a front-end pre-processor, its Readout Neurons provided new features, derived from the original features, for use by standard ML classifiers. We found that these "insect cyborgs", i.e. classifiers that are part-insect model and part-ML method, had significantly better performance than baseline ML methods alone on a vectorized MNIST dataset. The MothNet feature generator also substantially out-performed other feature generating methods such as PCA, PLS, and NNs, as well as pre-training to initialize NN weights. Cyborgs improved relative test set accuracy by an average of 6% to 33% depending on baseline ML accuracy, while relative reduction in test set error exceeded 50% for higher baseline accuracy ML models. These results indicate the potential value of BNN-inspired feature generators in the ML context.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.