Paper detail

Information Recovery from Pairwise Measurements

A variety of information processing tasks in practice involve recovering $n$ objects from single-shot graph-based measurements, particularly those taken over the edges of some measurement graph $\mathcal{G}$. This paper concerns the situation where each object takes value over a group of $M$ different values, and where one is interested to recover all these values based on observations of certain pairwise relations over $\mathcal{G}$. The imperfection of measurements presents two major challenges for information recovery: 1) $\textit{inaccuracy}$: a (dominant) portion $1-p$ of measurements are corrupted; 2) $\textit{incompleteness}$: a significant fraction of pairs are unobservable, i.e. $\mathcal{G}$ can be highly sparse. Under a natural random outlier model, we characterize the $\textit{minimax recovery rate}$, that is, the critical threshold of non-corruption rate $p$ below which exact information recovery is infeasible. This accommodates a very general class of pairwise relations. For various homogeneous random graph models (e.g. Erdos Renyi random graphs, random geometric graphs, small world graphs), the minimax recovery rate depends almost exclusively on the edge sparsity of the measurement graph $\mathcal{G}$ irrespective of other graphical metrics. This fundamental limit decays with the group size $M$ at a square root rate before entering a connectivity-limited regime. Under the Erdos Renyi random graph, a tractable combinatorial algorithm is proposed to approach the limit for large $M$ ($M=n^{Ω(1)}$), while order-optimal recovery is enabled by semidefinite programs in the small $M$ regime. The extended (and most updated) version of this work can be found at (http://arxiv.org/abs/1504.01369).

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.