Paper detail

Influence-aware Task Assignment in Spatial Crowdsourcing (Technical Report)

With the widespread diffusion of smartphones, Spatial Crowdsourcing (SC), which aims to assign spatial tasks to mobile workers, has drawn increasing attention in both academia and industry. One of the major issues is how to best assign tasks to workers. Given a worker and a task, the worker will choose to accept the task based on her affinity towards the task, and the worker can propagate the information of the task to attract more workers to perform it. These factors can be measured as worker-task influence. Since workers' affinities towards tasks are different and task issuers may ask workers who performed tasks to propagate the information of tasks to attract more workers to perform them, it is important to analyze worker-task influence when making assignments. We propose and solve a novel influence-aware task assignment problem in SC, where tasks are assigned to workers in a manner that achieves high worker-task influence. In particular, we aim to maximize the number of assigned tasks and worker-task influence. To solve the problem, we first determine workers' affinities towards tasks by identifying workers' historical task-performing patterns. Next, a Historical Acceptance approach is developed to measure workers' willingness of performing a task, i.e., the probability of workers visiting the location of the task when they are informed. Next, we propose a Random reverse reachable-based Propagation Optimization algorithm that exploits reverse reachable sets to calculate the probability of workers being informed about tasks in a social network. Based on worker-task influence derived from the above three factors, we propose three influence-aware task assignment algorithms that aim to maximize the number of assigned tasks and worker-task influence. Extensive experiments on two real-world datasets offer detailed insight into the effectiveness of our solutions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.