Paper detail

Inference for local parameters in convexity constrained models

We consider the problem of inference for local parameters of a convex regression function $f_0: [0,1] \to \mathbb{R}$ based on observations from a standard nonparametric regression model, using the convex least squares estimator (LSE) $\widehat{f}_n$. For $x_0 \in (0,1)$, the local parameters include the pointwise function value $f_0(x_0)$, the pointwise derivative $f_0'(x_0)$, and the anti-mode (i.e., the smallest minimizer) of $f_0$. The existing limiting distribution of the estimation error $(\widehat{f}_n(x_0) - f_0(x_0), \widehat{f}_n'(x_0) - f_0'(x_0) )$ depends on the unknown second derivative $f_0''(x_0)$, and is therefore not directly applicable for inference. To circumvent this impasse, we show that the following locally normalized errors (LNEs) enjoy pivotal limiting behavior: Let $[\widehat{u}(x_0), \widehat{v}(x_0)]$ be the maximal interval containing $x_0$ where $\widehat{f}_n$ is linear. Then, under standard conditions, $$\binom{ \sqrt{n(\widehat{v}(x_0)-\widehat{u}(x_0))}(\widehat{f}_n(x_0)-f_0(x_0)) }{ \sqrt{n(\widehat{v}(x_0)-\widehat{u}(x_0))^3}(\widehat{f}_n'(x_0)-f_0'(x_0))} \rightsquigarrow σ\cdot \binom{\mathbb{L}^{(0)}_2}{\mathbb{L}^{(1)}_2},$$ where $n$ is the sample size, $σ$ is the standard deviation of the errors, and $\mathbb{L}^{(0)}_2, \mathbb{L}^{(1)}_2$ are universal random variables. This asymptotically pivotal LNE theory instantly yields a simple tuning-free procedure for constructing CIs with asymptotically exact coverage and optimal length for $f_0(x_0)$ and $f_0'(x_0)$. We also construct an asymptotically pivotal LNE for the anti-mode of $f_0$, and its limiting distribution does not even depend on $σ$. These asymptotically pivotal LNE theories are further extended to other convexity/concavity constrained models (e.g., log-concave density estimation) for which a limit distribution theory is available for problem-specific estimators.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.