Paper detail

Inclusion graph of subgroups of a group

For a finite group $G$, we define the inclusion graph of subgroups of $G$, denoted by $\mathcal I(G)$, is a graph having all the proper subgroups of $G$ as its vertices and two distinct vertices $H$ and $K$ in $\mathcal I(G)$ are adjacent if and only if either $H \subset K$ or $K \subset H$. In this paper, we classify the finite groups whose inclusion graph of subgroups is one of complete, bipartite, tree, star, path, cycle, disconnected, claw-free. Also we classify the finite abelian groups whose inclusion graph of subgroups is planar. For any given finite group, we estimate the clique number, chromatic number, girth of its inclusion graph of subgroups and for a finite abelian group, we estimate the diameter of its inclusion graph of subgroups. Among the other results, we show that some groups can be determined by their inclusion graph of subgroups

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.