Paper detail

Improving the accuracy of nearest-neighbor classification using principled construction and stochastic sampling of training-set centroids

A conceptually simple way to classify images is to directly compare test-set data and training-set data. The accuracy of this approach is limited by the method of comparison used, and by the extent to which the training-set data cover configuration space. Here we show that this coverage can be substantially increased using coarse graining (replacing groups of images by their centroids) and stochastic sampling (using distinct sets of centroids in combination). We use the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST data sets to show that a principled coarse-graining algorithm can convert training images into fewer image centroids without loss of accuracy of classification of test-set images by nearest-neighbor classification. Distinct batches of centroids can be used in combination as a means of stochastically sampling configuration space, and can classify test-set data more accurately than can the unaltered training set. On the MNIST and Fashion-MNIST data sets this approach converts nearest-neighbor classification from a mid-ranking- to an upper-ranking member of the set of classical machine-learning techniques.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.