Paper detail

Improving Heart Rate Estimation on Consumer Grade Wrist-Worn Device Using Post-Calibration Approach

The technological advancement in wireless health monitoring through the direct contact of the skin allows the development of light-weight wrist-worn wearable devices to be equipped with different sensors such as photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors. However, the motion artifact (MA) is possible to occur during daily activities. In this study, we attempted to perform a post-calibration of the heart rate (HR) estimation during the three possible states of average daily activity (resting, \textcolor{red}{laying down}, and intense treadmill activity states) in 29 participants (130 minutes/person) on four popular wearable devices: Fitbit Charge HR, Apple Watch Series 4, TicWatch Pro, and Empatica E4. In comparison to the standard measurement (HR$_\text{ECG}$), HR provided by Fitbit Charge HR (HR$_\text{Fitbit}$) yielded the highest error of $3.26 \pm 0.34$ bpm in resting, $2.33 \pm 0.23$ bpm in \textcolor{red}{laying down}, $9.53 \pm 1.47$ bpm in intense treadmill activity states, and $5.02 \pm 0.64$ bpm in all states combined among the four chosen devices. Following our improving HR estimation model with rolling windows as feature (HR$_\text{R}$), the mean absolute error (MAE) was significantly reduced by $33.44\%$ in resting, $15.88\%$ in \textcolor{red}{laying down}, $9.55\%$ in intense treadmill activity states, and $18.73\%$ in all states combined. This demonstrates the feasibility of our proposed methods in order to correct and provide HR monitoring post-calibrated with high accuracy, raising further awareness of individual fitness in the daily application.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.