Paper detail

Improved Search of Relevant Points for Nearest-Neighbor Classification

Given a training set $P \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, the nearest-neighbor classifier assigns any query point $q \in \mathbb{R}^d$ to the class of its closest point in $P$. To answer these classification queries, some training points are more relevant than others. We say a training point is relevant if its omission from the training set could induce the misclassification of some query point in $\mathbb{R}^d$. These relevant points are commonly known as border points, as they define the boundaries of the Voronoi diagram of $P$ that separate points of different classes. Being able to compute this set of points efficiently is crucial to reduce the size of the training set without affecting the accuracy of the nearest-neighbor classifier. Improving over a decades-long result by Clarkson, in a recent paper by Eppstein an output-sensitive algorithm was proposed to find the set of border points of $P$ in $O( n^2 + nk^2 )$ time, where $k$ is the size of such set. In this paper, we improve this algorithm to have time complexity equal to $O( nk^2 )$ by proving that the first steps of their algorithm, which require $O( n^2 )$ time, are unnecessary.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.