Source author record

Alejandro Flores-Velazco

Alejandro Flores-Velazco appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
4topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Improved Search of Relevant Points for Nearest-Neighbor Classification

Given a training set $P \subset \mathbb{R}^d$, the nearest-neighbor classifier assigns any query point $q \in \mathbb{R}^d$ to the class of its closest point in $P$. To answer these classification queries, some training points are more relevant than others. We say a training point is relevant if its omission from the training set could induce the misclassification of some query point in $\mathbb{R}^d$. These relevant points are commonly known as border points, as they define the boundaries of the Voronoi diagram of $P$ that separate points of different classes. Being able to compute this set of points efficiently is crucial to reduce the size of the training set without affecting the accuracy of the nearest-neighbor classifier. Improving over a decades-long result by Clarkson, in a recent paper by Eppstein an output-sensitive algorithm was proposed to find the set of border points of $P$ in $O( n^2 + nk^2 )$ time, where $k$ is the size of such set. In this paper, we improve this algorithm to have time complexity equal to $O( nk^2 )$ by proving that the first steps of their algorithm, which require $O( n^2 )$ time, are unnecessary.

preprint2020arXiv

Coresets for the Nearest-Neighbor Rule

Given a training set $P$ of labeled points, the nearest-neighbor rule predicts the class of an unlabeled query point as the label of its closest point in the set. To improve the time and space complexity of classification, a natural question is how to reduce the training set without significantly affecting the accuracy of the nearest-neighbor rule. Nearest-neighbor condensation deals with finding a subset $R \subseteq P$ such that for every point $p \in P$, $p$'s nearest-neighbor in $R$ has the same label as $p$. This relates to the concept of coresets, which can be broadly defined as subsets of the set, such that an exact result on the coreset corresponds to an approximate result on the original set. However, the guarantees of a coreset hold for any query point, and not only for the points of the training set. This paper introduces the concept of coresets for nearest-neighbor classification. We extend existing criteria used for condensation, and prove sufficient conditions to correctly classify any query point when using these subsets. Additionally, we prove that finding such subsets of minimum cardinality is NP-hard, and propose quadratic-time approximation algorithms with provable upper-bounds on the size of their selected subsets. Moreover, we show how to improve one of these algorithms to have subquadratic runtime, being the first of this kind for condensation.

preprint2020arXiv

Social Distancing is Good for Points too!

The nearest-neighbor rule is a well-known classification technique that, given a training set P of labeled points, classifies any unlabeled query point with the label of its closest point in P. The nearest-neighbor condensation problem aims to reduce the training set without harming the accuracy of the nearest-neighbor rule. FCNN is the most popular algorithm for condensation. It is heuristic in nature, and theoretical results for it are scarce. In this paper, we settle the question of whether reasonable upper-bounds can be proven for the size of the subset selected by FCNN. First, we show that the algorithm can behave poorly when points are too close to each other, forcing it to select many more points than necessary. We then successfully modify the algorithm to avoid such cases, thus imposing that selected points should "keep some distance". This modification is sufficient to prove useful upper-bounds, along with approximation guarantees for the algorithm.