Paper detail

Impact of new ICRU90 key data on stopping-power ratios and beam quality correction factors for carbon ion beams

The recent update of dosimetric key data by the `International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements' impacts the computation of beam quality correction factors $k_Q$ via several changes, e.g. for the mean excitation energies, $I$, which enters the stopping power computation for water and air, the computation procedure itself, the average energy expended in the production of an ion pair in air, $W/e$, as well as chamber perturbation factors for Cobalt-60. An accurate assessment of water-to-air stopping-power ratio, $s_{\rm w,air}$, in reference conditions with new recommendation is necessary to update the dosimetry protocols for carbon ion beams. The new ICRU90 key data were considered for computation of $s_{\rm w,air}$ for carbon ion beams using Monte Carlo transport simulations for a number of reference conditions, namely monoenergetic carbon ion beams with range in water from 3 to 30\,cm and Spread-Out Bragg peaks (SOBPs) of different widths and depths in water. New recommendations for $s_{\rm w,air}$ are presented, namely 1.1247 for the reference condition of 1\,g\,cm$^{-2}$ depth for monoenergetic carbon ion beams and 1.1274 at the center of physically-optimized SOBPs. The recommendation of a constant value (1.126) represents the stopping-power ratio within a 0.3\,\% variation of $s_{\rm w,air}$ for the different reference conditions. The impact of these new $s_{\rm w,air}$ values and the updated key data on the $k_Q$ for carbon ion beams was evaluated in a second step. The changes agree very well with experimental data for the case of cylindrical ionization chambers, but larger discrepancies are observed for plate-parallel ionization chambers.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.