Paper detail

Hypothesis testing in the presence of multiple samples under density ratio models

This paper presents a hypothesis testing method given independent samples from a number of connected populations. The method is motivated by a forestry project for monitoring change in the strength of lumber. Traditional practice has been built upon nonparametric methods which ignore the fact that these populations are connected. By pooling the information in multiple samples through a density ratio model, the proposed empirical likelihood method leads to a more efficient inference and therefore reduces the cost in applications. The new test has a classical chi-square null limiting distribution. Its power function is obtained under a class of local alternatives. The local power is found increased even when some underlying populations are unrelated to the hypothesis of interest. Simulation studies confirm that this test has better power properties than potential competitors, and is robust to model misspecification. An application example to lumber strength is included.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.