Paper detail

Hyperlink Regression via Bregman Divergence

A collection of $U \: (\in \mathbb{N})$ data vectors is called a $U$-tuple, and the association strength among the vectors of a tuple is termed as the \emph{hyperlink weight}, that is assumed to be symmetric with respect to permutation of the entries in the index. We herein propose Bregman hyperlink regression (BHLR), which learns a user-specified symmetric similarity function such that it predicts the tuple's hyperlink weight from data vectors stored in the $U$-tuple. BHLR is a simple and general framework for hyper-relational learning, that minimizes Bregman-divergence (BD) between the hyperlink weights and estimated similarities defined for the corresponding tuples; BHLR encompasses various existing methods, such as logistic regression ($U=1$), Poisson regression ($U=1$), link prediction ($U=2$), and those for representation learning, such as graph embedding ($U=2$), matrix factorization ($U=2$), tensor factorization ($U \geq 2$), and their variants equipped with arbitrary BD. Nonlinear functions (e.g., neural networks), can be employed for the similarity functions. However, there are theoretical challenges such that some of different tuples of BHLR may share data vectors therein, unlike the i.i.d. setting of classical regression. We address these theoretical issues, and proved that BHLR equipped with arbitrary BD and $U \in \mathbb{N}$ is (P-1) statistically consistent, that is, it asymptotically recovers the underlying true conditional expectation of hyperlink weights given data vectors, and (P-2) computationally tractable, that is, it is efficiently computed by stochastic optimization algorithms using a novel generalized minibatch sampling procedure for hyper-relational data. Consequently, theoretical guarantees for BHLR including several existing methods, that have been examined experimentally, are provided in a unified manner.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.