Paper detail

Honest and adaptive confidence sets in Lp

We consider the problem of constructing honest and adaptive confidence sets in Lp-loss (with p>=1 and p < infinity) over sets of Sobolev-type classes, in the setting of non-parametric Gaussian regression. The objective is to adapt the diameter of the confidence sets with respect to the smoothness degree of the underlying function, while ensuring that the true function lies in the confidence interval with high probability.When p >=2, we identify two main regimes, (i) one where adaptation is possible without any restrictions on the model, and (ii) one where critical regions have to be removed. We also prove by a matching lower bound that the size of the regions that we remove can not be chosen significantly smaller. These regimes are shown to depend in a qualitative way on the index p, and a continuous transition from p = 2 to p = infinity is exhibited.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.