Paper detail

Homophyly and Randomness Resist Cascading Failure in Networks

The universal properties of power law and small world phenomenon of networks seem unavoidably obstacles for security of networking systems. Existing models never give secure networks. We found that the essence of security is the security against cascading failures of attacks and that nature solves the security by mechanisms. We proposed a model of networks by the natural mechanisms of homophyly, randomness and preferential attachment. It was shown that homophyly creates a community structure, that homophyly and randomness introduce ordering in the networks, and that homophyly creates inclusiveness and introduces rules of infections. These principles allow us to provably guarantee the security of the networks against any attacks. Our results show that security can be achieved provably by structures, that there is a tradeoff between the roles of structures and of thresholds in security engineering, and that power law and small world property are never obstacles for security of networks.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.