Paper detail

Hole conductivity through a defect band in $\rm ZnGa_2O_4$

Semiconductors with wide band gap (3.0 eV), high dielectric constant (> 10), good thermal dissipation, and capable of $n$- and $p$-type doping are highly desirable for high-energy power electronic devices. Recent studies indicate that $\rm ZnGa_2O_4$ may be suitable for these applications, standing out as an alternative to $\rm Ga_2O_3$. The simple face centered cubic spinel structure of $\rm ZnGa_2O_4$ results in isotropic electronic and optical properties, in contrast to the large anisotropic properties of the $β$-monoclinic $\rm Ga_2O_3$. In addition, $\rm ZnGa_2O_4$ has shown, on average, better thermal dissipation and potential for $n$- and $p$-type conductivity. Here we use density functional theory and hybrid functional calculations to investigate the electronic, optical, and point defect properties of $\rm ZnGa_2O_4$, focusing on the possibility for $n$- and p-type conductivity. We find that the cation antisite $\rm Ga_{Zn}$ is the lowest energy donor defect that can lead to unintentional $n$-type conductivity. The stability of self-trapped holes (small hole polarons) and the high formation energy of acceptor defects make it difficult to achieve $p$-type conductivity. However, with excess of Zn, forming $\rm Zn_{(1+2x)}Ga_{2(1-x)}O_4$ alloys display an intermediate valence band, facilitating $p$-type conductivity. Due to the localized nature of this intermediate valence band, $p$-type conductivity by polaron hopping is expected, explaining the low mobility and low hole density observed in recent experiments.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.