Paper detail

Hindrance of the excitation of the Hoyle state and the ghost of the $2^+_2$ state in $^{12}$C

While the Hoyle state (the isoscalar $0^+_2$ excitation at 7.65 MeV in $^{12}$C) has been observed in almost all the electron and $α$ inelastic scattering experiments, the second $2^+$ excited state of $^{12}$C at $E_{\rm x}\approx 10$ MeV, believed to be an excitation of the Hoyle state, has not been clearly observed in these measurements excepting the high-precision \aap experiments at $E_α=240$ and 386 MeV. Given the (spin and isospin zero) $α$-particle as a good probe for the nuclear isoscalar excitations, it remains a puzzle why the peak of the $2^+_2$ state could not be clearly identified in the measured \aap spectra. To investigate this effect, we have performed a microscopic folding model analysis of the \ac scattering data at 240 and 386 MeV in both the Distorted Wave Born Approximation (DWBA) and coupled-channel (CC) formalism, using the nuclear transition densities given by the antisymmetrized molecular dynamics (AMD) approach and a complex CDM3Y6 density dependent interaction. Although AMD predicts a very weak transition strength for the direct $(0^+_1\to 2^+_2)$ excitation, our detailed analysis has shown evidence that a weak \emph{ghost} of the $2^+_2$ state could be identified in the 240 MeV \aap data for the $0^+_3$ state at 10.3 MeV, when the CC effects by the indirect excitation of the $2^+_2$ state are taken into account. Based on the same AMD structure input and preliminary \aap data at 386 MeV, we have estimated relative contributions from the $2^+_2$ and $0^+_3$ states to the excitation of $^{12}$C at $E_{\rm x}\approx 10$ MeV as well as possible contamination by $3^-_1$ state.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.