Paper detail

High dimensional errors-in-variables models with dependent measurements

Suppose that we observe $y \in \mathbb{R}^f$ and $X \in \mathbb{R}^{f \times m}$ in the following errors-in-variables model: \begin{eqnarray*} y & = & X_0 β^* + ε\\ X & = & X_0 + W \end{eqnarray*} where $X_0$ is a $f \times m$ design matrix with independent subgaussian row vectors, $ε\in \mathbb{R}^f$ is a noise vector and $W$ is a mean zero $f \times m$ random noise matrix with independent subgaussian column vectors, independent of $X_0$ and $ε$. This model is significantly different from those analyzed in the literature in the sense that we allow the measurement error for each covariate to be a dependent vector across its $f$ observations. Such error structures appear in the science literature when modeling the trial-to-trial fluctuations in response strength shared across a set of neurons. Under sparsity and restrictive eigenvalue type of conditions, we show that one is able to recover a sparse vector $β^* \in \mathbb{R}^m$ from the model given a single observation matrix $X$ and the response vector $y$. We establish consistency in estimating $β^*$ and obtain the rates of convergence in the $\ell_q$ norm, where $q = 1, 2$ for the Lasso-type estimator, and for $q \in [1, 2]$ for a Dantzig-type conic programming estimator. We show error bounds which approach that of the regular Lasso and the Dantzig selector in case the errors in $W$ are tending to 0.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.