Paper detail

High-degeneracy points protected by site-permutation symmetries

Space group symmetries dictate the energy degeneracy of quasiparticles (e.g., electronic, photonic) in crystalline structures. For spinless systems, there can only be double or triple degeneracies protected by these symmetries, while other degeneracies are usually taken as \textit{accidental}. In this Letter we show that it is possible to design higher degeneracies exploring site permutation symmetries. These design principles are shown to be satisfied in previously studied lattices, and new structures are proposed with three, four and five degeneracy points for spinless systems. The results are general and apply to different quasiparticle models. Here, we focus on a tight-binding approach for the electronic case as a proof of principle. The resulting high-degeneracy points are protected by the site-permutation symmetries, yielding pseudospin-1 and -2 Dirac fermions. The strategy proposed here can be used to design lattices with high-degeneracy points in electronic (e.g. metal-organic frameworks), photonic, phononic, magnonic and cold-atom systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.