Paper detail

HetSched: Quality-of-Mission Aware Scheduling for Autonomous Vehicle SoCs

Systems-on-Chips (SoCs) that power autonomous vehicles (AVs) must meet stringent performance and safety requirements prior to deployment. With increasing complexity in AV applications, the system needs to meet these real-time demands of multiple safety-critical applications simultaneously. A typical AV-SoC is a heterogeneous multiprocessor consisting of accelerators supported by general-purpose cores. Such heterogeneity, while needed for power-performance efficiency, complicates the art of task scheduling. In this paper, we demonstrate that hardware heterogeneity impacts the scheduler's effectiveness and that optimizing for only the real-time aspect of applications is not sufficient in AVs. Therefore, a more holistic approach is required -- one that considers global Quality-of-Mission (QoM) metrics, as defined in the paper. We then propose HetSched, a multi-step scheduler that leverages dynamic runtime information about the underlying heterogeneous hardware platform, along with the applications' real-time constraints and the task traffic in the system to optimize overall mission performance. HetSched proposes two scheduling policies: MSstat and MSdyn and scheduling optimizations like task pruning, hybrid heterogeneous ranking and rank update. HetSched improves overall mission performance on average by 4.6x, 2.6x and 2.6x when compared against CPATH, ADS and 2lvl-EDF (state-of-the-art real-time schedulers built for heterogeneous systems), respectively, and achieves an average of 53.3% higher hardware utilization, while meeting 100% critical deadlines for real-world applications of autonomous vehicles. Furthermore, when used as part of an SoC design space exploration loop, in comparison to prior schedulers, HetSched reduces the number of processing elements required by an SoC to safely complete AV's missions by 35% on average while achieving 2.7x lower energy-mission time product.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.