Paper detail

Hellinger-Bhattacharyya cross-validation for shape-preserving multivariate wavelet thresholding

The benefits of the wavelet approach for density estimation are well established in the literature, especially when the density to estimate is irregular or heterogeneous in smoothness. However, wavelet density estimates are typically not bona fide densities. In Aya-Moreno et al (2018), a `shape-preserving' wavelet density estimator was introduced, including as main step the estimation of the square-root of the density. A natural concept involving square-root of densities is the Hellinger distance - or equivalently, the Bhattacharyya affinity coefficient. In this paper, we deliver a fully data-driven version of the above 'shape-preserving' wavelet density estimator, where all user-defined parameters, such as resolution level or thresholding specifications, are selected by optimising an original leave-one-out version of the Hellinger-Bhattacharyya criterion. The theoretical optimality of the proposed procedure is established, while simulations show the strong practical performance of the estimator. Within that framework, we also propose a novel but natural 'jackknife thresholding' scheme, which proves superior to other, more classical thresholding options.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.