Paper detail

Helium under high pressure: A comparative study of all-electron and pseudopotential methods within density functional theory

We have calculated the ground state electronic structure of He under pressure from 0 to 1500 GPa using both all-electron full-potential and pseudopotential methods based on the density functional theory (DFT). We find that throughout this pressure range, pseudopotentials yield essentially the same energy-volume curve for all of bcc, fcc, and hcp configurations as does the full-potential method, a strong indication that pseudopotential approximation works well for He both as the common element in some giant planets and as detrimental impurities in fusion reactor materials. The hcp lattice is always the most stable structure and bcc the least stable one. Since the energy preference of hcp over fcc and bcc is within 0.01 eV below 100 GPa and about 0.1 eV at 1500 GPa, on the same order of the error bar in local or semi-local density approximations in DFT, phase transitions can only be discussed with more precise description of electron correlation in Quantum Monte Carlo or DFT-based GW methods.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.