Paper detail

GW approach to Anderson model out of equilibrium: Coulomb blockade and false hysteresis in the I-V characteristics

The Anderson model for a single impurity coupled to two leads is studied using the $GW$ approximation in the strong electron-electron interaction regime as a function of the alignment of the impurity level relative to the chemical potentials in the leads. We employ a non-equilibrium Green's function technique to calculate the electron self-energy, the spin density and the current as a function of bias across the junction. In addition we develop an expression for the change in the expectation value of the energy of the system that results when the impurity is coupled to the leads, including the role of Coulomb interactions through the electron self energy in the region of the junction. The current-voltage characteristics calculated within the GW approximation exhibit Coulomb blockade. Depending on the gate voltage and applied bias, we find that there can be more than one steady-state solution for the system, which may give rise to a hysteresis in the I-V characteristics. We show that the hysteresis is an artifact of the $GW$ approximation and would not survive if quantum fluctuations beyond the $GW$ approximation are included.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.