Paper detail

Growth of InN quantum dots to nanorods: A competition between nucleation and growth rates

Growth evolution of InN nanostructures via a chemical vapor deposition technique is reported using In_2O_3 as precursor material and NH_3 as reactive gas in the temperature range of 550-700 ^oC. Morphology of the nanostructures solely depends on the growth temperature, evolving from quantum dot sized nanoparticles to nanorods. It is found that 630 ^oC is the threshold temperature for nanorod growth. At 630 ^oC, nucleation starts with multifaceted particle having {10-12} surface planes. Subsequently, hexagonal polyhedral NRs are grown along the [0001] direction with non-polar surfaces of m-planes {10-10}. A comprehensive study is carried out to understand the evolution of nanorods as a function of growth parameters like temperature, time and gas flow rate. Change in the morphology of nanostructures is explained based on the nucleation rate and the growth rates during the phase formation. Raman studies of these nanostructures show that a biaxial strain is developed because of unintentional impurity doping with the increase in growth temperature.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.