Paper detail

Gromov hyperbolicity in lexicographic product graphs

If $X$ is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a {\it geodesic triangle} $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-\emph{hyperbolic} $($in the Gromov sense$)$ if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. If $X$ is hyperbolic, we denote by $δ(X)$ the sharp hyperbolicity constant of $X$, i.e. $δ(X)=\inf\{δ\ge 0: \, X \, \text{ is $δ$-hyperbolic}\}.$ In this paper we characterize the lexicographic product of two graphs $G_1\circ G_2$ which are hyperbolic, in terms of $G_1$ and $G_2$: the lexicographic product graph $G_1\circ G_2$ is hyperbolic if and only if $G_1$ is hyperbolic, unless if $G_1$ is a trivial graph (the graph with a single vertex); if $G_1$ is trivial, then $G_1\circ G_2$ is hyperbolic if and only if $G_2$ is hyperbolic. In particular, we obtain the sharp inequalities $δ(G_1)\le δ(G_1\circ G_2) \le δ(G_1) + 3/2$ if $G_1$ is not a trivial graph, and we characterize the graphs for which the second inequality is attained.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.