BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

José M. Rodríguez

José M. Rodríguez appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.COmath.MGmath.CAmath.APmath.DG

Catalog footprint

What is connected

12works
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A new flow model for a thin viscous fluid film between two moving surfaces

We propose a two-dimensional flow model of a viscous fluid between two close moving surfaces. We show that its asymptotic behavior, when the distance between the two surfaces tends to zero, is the same as that of the the Navier-Stokes equations. The solutions of the new model and Navier-Stokes equations converge to the same limit problem, that depends on the boundary conditions. If slip velocity boundary conditions are imposed on the upper and lower bound surfaces, the limit is solution of a lubrication model, but if the tractions and friction forces are known on both bound surfaces, the limit is solution of a shallow water model. The model proposed has been obtained to be a valuable tool for computing viscous fluid flow between two close moving surfaces, without the need to decide a priori whether the flow is typical of a lubrication problem or it is of shallow water type, and without the enormous computational effort that would be required to solve the Navier-Stokes equations in such a thin domain.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Jensen-type inequalities for convex and $m$-convex functions via fractional calculus

Inequalities play an important role in pure and applied mathematics. In particular, Jensen's inequality, one of the most famous inequalities, plays a main role in the study of the existence and uniqueness of initial and boundary value problems for differential equations. In this work we prove some new Jensen-type inequalities for $m$-convex functions, and we apply them to generalized Riemann-Liouville-type integral operators. It is remarkable that, if we consider $m=1$, we obtain new inequalities for convex functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On Opial-type inequalities via fractional calculus

Inequalities play an important role in pure and applied mathematics. In particular, Opial inequality plays a main role in the study of the existence and uniqueness of initial and boundary value problems for differential equations. It has several interesting generalizations. In this work we prove some new Opial-type inequalities, and we apply them to generalized Riemann-Liouville-type integral operators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Cheeger isoperimetric constant of Gromov hyperbolic manifolds and graphs

In this paper we study the relationship of hyperbolicity and (Cheeger) isoperimetric inequality in the context of Riemannian manifolds and graphs. We characterize the hyperbolic manifolds and graphs (with bounded local geometry) verifying this isoperimetric inequality, in terms of their Gromov boundary. Furthermore, we characterize the trees with isoperimetric inequality (without any hypothesis). As an application of our results, we obtain the solvability of the Dirichlet problem at infinity for these Riemannian manifolds and graphs, and that the Martin boundary is homeomorphic to the Gromov boundary.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Hyperbolicity of direct products of graphs

If $X$ is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a {\it geodesic triangle} $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-\emph{hyperbolic} $($in the Gromov sense$)$ if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. If $X$ is hyperbolic, we denote by $δ(X)$ the sharp hyperbolicity constant of $X$, i.e., $δ(X)=\inf\{δ\ge 0: \, X \, \text{ is $δ$-hyperbolic}\,\}.$ Some previous works characterize the hyperbolic product graphs (for the Cartesian, strong, join, corona and lexicographic products) in terms of properties of the factor graphs. However, the problem with the direct product is more complicated. In this paper, we prove that if the direct product $G_1\times G_2$ is hyperbolic, then one factor is hyperbolic and the other one is bounded. Also, we prove that this necessary condition is, in fact, a characterization in many cases. In other cases, we find characterizations which are not so simple. Furthermore, we obtain formulae or good bounds for the hyperbolicity constant of the direct product of some important graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Alliance polynomial of regular graphs

The alliance polynomial of a graph $G$ with order $n$ and maximum degree $Δ$ is the polynomial $A(G; x) = \sum_{k=-Δ}^Δ A_{k}(G) \, x^{n+k}$, where $A_{k}(G)$ is the number of exact defensive $k$-alliances in $G$. We obtain some properties of $A(G; x)$ and its coefficients for regular graphs. In particular, we characterize the degree of regular graphs by the number of non-zero coefficients of their alliance polynomial. Besides, we prove that the family of alliance polynomials of $Δ$-regular graphs with small degree is a very special one, since it does not contain alliance polynomials of graphs which are not $Δ$-regular. By using this last result and direct computation we find that the alliance polynomial determines uniquely each cubic graph of order less than or equal to $10$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Gromov hyperbolicity in lexicographic product graphs

If $X$ is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a {\it geodesic triangle} $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-\emph{hyperbolic} $($in the Gromov sense$)$ if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. If $X$ is hyperbolic, we denote by $δ(X)$ the sharp hyperbolicity constant of $X$, i.e. $δ(X)=\inf\{δ\ge 0: \, X \, \text{ is $δ$-hyperbolic}\}.$ In this paper we characterize the lexicographic product of two graphs $G_1\circ G_2$ which are hyperbolic, in terms of $G_1$ and $G_2$: the lexicographic product graph $G_1\circ G_2$ is hyperbolic if and only if $G_1$ is hyperbolic, unless if $G_1$ is a trivial graph (the graph with a single vertex); if $G_1$ is trivial, then $G_1\circ G_2$ is hyperbolic if and only if $G_2$ is hyperbolic. In particular, we obtain the sharp inequalities $δ(G_1)\le δ(G_1\circ G_2) \le δ(G_1) + 3/2$ if $G_1$ is not a trivial graph, and we characterize the graphs for which the second inequality is attained.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Gromov hyperbolicity of minor graphs

If $X$ is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a geodesic triangle $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-hyperbolic (in the Gromov sense) if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. The study of hyperbolic graphs is an interesting topic since the hyperbolicity of a geodesic metric space is equivalent to the hyperbolicity of a graph related to it. In the context of graphs, to remove and to contract an edge of a graph are natural transformations. The main aim in this work is to obtain quantitative information about the distortion of the hyperbolicity constant of the graph $G \setminus e$ (respectively, $\,G/e\,$) obtained from the graph $G$ by deleting (respectively, contracting) an arbitrary edge $e$ from it. This work provides information about the hyperbolicity constant of minor graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Computing the alliance polynomial of a graph

The alliance polynomial of a graph $Γ$ with order $n$ and maximum degree $δ_1$ is the polynomial $A(Γ; x) = \sum_{k=-δ_1}^{δ_1} A_{k}(Γ) \, x^{n+k}$, where $A_{k}(Γ)$ is the number of exact defensive $k$-alliances in $Γ$. We provide an algorithm for computing the alliance polynomial. Furthermore, we obtain some properties of $A(Γ; x)$ and its coefficients. In particular, we prove that the path, cycle, complete and star graphs are characterized by their alliance polynomials. We also show that the alliance polynomial characterizes many graphs that are not distinguished by other usual polynomials of graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Hyperbolicity in the corona and join of graphs

If X is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a {\it geodesic triangle} $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-\emph{hyperbolic} $($in the Gromov sense$)$ if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. If $X$ is hyperbolic, we denote by $δ(X)$ the sharp hyperbolicity constant of $X$, i.e. $δ(X)=\inf\{δ\ge 0: \, X \, \text{ is $δ$-hyperbolic}\,\}\,.$ Some previous works characterize the hyperbolic product graphs (for the Cartesian product, strong product and lexicographic product) in terms of properties of the factor graphs. In this paper we characterize the hyperbolic product graphs for graph join $G_1\uplus G_2$ and the corona $G_1\diamond G_2$: $G_1\uplus G_2$ is always hyperbolic, and $G_1\diamond G_2$ is hyperbolic if and only if $G_1$ is hyperbolic. Furthermore, we obtain simple formulae for the hyperbolicity constant of the graph join $G_1\uplus G_2$ and the corona $G_1\diamond G_2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

New inequalities on the hyperbolicity constant of line graphs

If X is a geodesic metric space and $x_1,x_2,x_3\in X$, a {\it geodesic triangle} $T=\{x_1,x_2,x_3\}$ is the union of the three geodesics $[x_1x_2]$, $[x_2x_3]$ and $[x_3x_1]$ in $X$. The space $X$ is $δ$-\emph{hyperbolic} $($in the Gromov sense$)$ if any side of $T$ is contained in a $δ$-neighborhood of the union of the two other sides, for every geodesic triangle $T$ in $X$. We denote by $δ(X)$ the sharp hyperbolicity constant of $X$, i.e. $δ(X):=\inf\{δ\ge 0: \, X \, \text{ is $δ$-hyperbolic}\,\}\,. $ The main result of this paper is the inequality $δ(G) \le δ(\mathcal L(G))$ for the line graph $\mathcal L(G)$ of every graph $G$. We prove also the upper bound $δ(\mathcal L(G)) \le 5 δ(G)+ 3 l_{max}$, where $l_{max}$ is the supremum of the lengths of the edges of $G$. Furthermore, if every edge of $G$ has length $k$, we obtain $δ(G) \le δ(\mathcal L(G)) \le 5 δ(G)+ 5k/2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access