Paper detail

Graph Information Vanishing Phenomenon inImplicit Graph Neural Networks

One of the key problems of GNNs is how to describe the importance of neighbor nodes in the aggregation process for learning node representations. A class of GNNs solves this problem by learning implicit weights to represent the importance of neighbor nodes, which we call implicit GNNs such as Graph Attention Network. The basic idea of implicit GNNs is to introduce graph information with special properties followed by Learnable Transformation Structures (LTS) which encode the importance of neighbor nodes via a data-driven way. In this paper, we argue that LTS makes the special properties of graph information disappear during the learning process, resulting in graph information unhelpful for learning node representations. We call this phenomenon Graph Information Vanishing (GIV). Also, we find that LTS maps different graph information into highly similar results. To validate the above two points, we design two sets of 70 random experiments on five Implicit GNNs methods and seven benchmark datasets by using a random permutation operator to randomly disrupt the order of graph information and replacing graph information with random values. We find that randomization does not affect the model performance in 93\% of the cases, with about 7 percentage causing an average 0.5\% accuracy loss. And the cosine similarity of output results, generated by LTS mapping different graph information, over 99\% with an 81\% proportion. The experimental results provide evidence to support the existence of GIV in Implicit GNNs and imply that the existing methods of Implicit GNNs do not make good use of graph information. The relationship between graph information and LTS should be rethought to ensure that graph information is used in node representation.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.