Paper detail

Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Loss for Few-Shot Learning

Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) is one of the most successful meta-learning techniques for few-shot learning. It uses gradient descent to learn commonalities between various tasks, enabling the model to learn the meta-initialization of its own parameters to quickly adapt to new tasks using a small amount of labeled training data. A key challenge to few-shot learning is task uncertainty. Although a strong prior can be obtained from meta-learning with a large number of tasks, a precision model of the new task cannot be guaranteed because the volume of the training dataset is normally too small. In this study, first,in the process of choosing initialization parameters, the new method is proposed for task-specific learner adaptively learn to select initialization parameters that minimize the loss of new tasks. Then, we propose two improved methods for the meta-loss part: Method 1 generates weights by comparing meta-loss differences to improve the accuracy when there are few classes, and Method 2 introduces the homoscedastic uncertainty of each task to weigh multiple losses based on the original gradient descent,as a way to enhance the generalization ability to novel classes while ensuring accuracy improvement. Compared with previous gradient-based meta-learning methods, our model achieves better performance in regression tasks and few-shot classification and improves the robustness of the model to the learning rate and query sets in the meta-test set.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.