Source author record

Lin Ding

Lin Ding appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Gradient-Based Meta-Learning Using Uncertainty to Weigh Loss for Few-Shot Learning

Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning (MAML) is one of the most successful meta-learning techniques for few-shot learning. It uses gradient descent to learn commonalities between various tasks, enabling the model to learn the meta-initialization of its own parameters to quickly adapt to new tasks using a small amount of labeled training data. A key challenge to few-shot learning is task uncertainty. Although a strong prior can be obtained from meta-learning with a large number of tasks, a precision model of the new task cannot be guaranteed because the volume of the training dataset is normally too small. In this study, first,in the process of choosing initialization parameters, the new method is proposed for task-specific learner adaptively learn to select initialization parameters that minimize the loss of new tasks. Then, we propose two improved methods for the meta-loss part: Method 1 generates weights by comparing meta-loss differences to improve the accuracy when there are few classes, and Method 2 introduces the homoscedastic uncertainty of each task to weigh multiple losses based on the original gradient descent,as a way to enhance the generalization ability to novel classes while ensuring accuracy improvement. Compared with previous gradient-based meta-learning methods, our model achieves better performance in regression tasks and few-shot classification and improves the robustness of the model to the learning rate and query sets in the meta-test set.

preprint2009arXiv

A Tale of Two Curricula: The performance of two thousand students in introductory electromagnetism

The performance of over 2000 students in introductory calculus-based electromagnetism (E&M) courses at four large research universities was measured using the Brief Electricity and Magnetism Assessment (BEMA). Two different curricula were used at these universities: a traditional E&M curriculum and the Matter & Interactions (M&I) curriculum. At each university, post-instruction BEMA test averages were significantly higher for the M&I curriculum than for the traditional curriculum. The differences in post-test averages cannot be explained by differences in variables such as pre-instruction BEMA scores, grade point average, or SAT scores. BEMA performance on categories of items organized by subtopic was also compared at one of the universities; M&I averages were significantly higher in each topic. The results suggest that the M&I curriculum is more effective than the traditional curriculum at teaching E&M concepts to students, possibly because the learning progression in M&I reorganizes and augments the traditional sequence of topics, for example, by increasing early emphasis on the vector field concept and by emphasizing the effects of fields on matter at the microscopic level.

preprint2008arXiv

Learning of Content Knowledge and Development of Scientific Reasoning Ability: A Cross Culture Comparison

Student content knowledge and general reasoning abilities are two important areas in education practice and research. However, there hasn't been much work in physics education that clearly documents the possible interactions between content learning and the development of general reasoning abilities. In this paper, we report one study of a systematic research to investigate the possible interactions between students' learning of physics content knowledge and the development of general scientific reasoning abilities. Specifically, this study seeks to answer the research question of whether and to what extent content learning may affect the development of general reasoning abilities. College entrance testing data of freshman college students in both USA and China were collected using three standardized tests, FCI, BEMA, and Lawson's Classroom Test of Scientific Reasoning (Lawson Test). The results suggest that years of rigorous training of physics knowledge in middle and high schools have made significant impact on Chinese students' ability in solving physics problems, while such training doesn't seem to have direct effects on their general ability in scientific reasoning, which was measured to be at the same level as that of the students in USA. Details of the curriculum structures in the education systems of USA and China are also compared to provide a basis for interpreting the assessment data.