Paper detail

Giant dipole resonance width and the universality of the Critical Temperature included Fluctuation Model

The universality of the Critical Temperature included Fluctuation Model (CTFM) in explaining the evolution of the giant dipole resonance (GDR) width as a function of angular momentum is examined in the light of recent experimental data on $^{144}$Sm and $^{152}$Gd. We compare both the data sets with the phenomenological formula based on the CTFM and the thermal shape fluctuation model (pTSFM). The CTFM describes both the data sets reasonably well using the actual ground state GDR width ($Γ_0$) values, whereas, the pTSFM describes the $^{144}$Sm data well but is unable to explain the $^{152}$Gd data using a single value of $Γ_0$ for two excitation energies. These interesting results clearly indicate that the phenomenological CTFM can be used universally to describe the evolution of the GDR width with both angular momentum and temperature in the entire mass region. Moreover, it should provide new insights into the modification of the TSFM.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.