Paper detail

Geometry of log-concave functions: the $L_p$ Asplund sum and the $L_{p}$ Minkowski problem

The aim of this paper is to develop a basic framework of the $L_p$ theory for the geometry of log-concave functions, which can be viewed as a functional "lifting" of the $L_p$ Brunn-Minkowski theory for convex bodies. To fulfill this goal, by combining the $L_p$ Asplund sum of log-concave functions for all $p>1$ and the total mass, we obtain a Prékopa-Leindler type inequality and propose a definition for the first variation of the total mass in the $L_p$ setting. Based on these, we further establish an $L_p$ Minkowski type inequality related to the first variation of the total mass and derive a variational formula which motivates the definition of our $L_p$ surface area measure for log-concave functions. Consequently, the $L_p$ Minkowski problem for log-concave functions, which aims to characterize the $L_p$ surface area measure for log-concave functions, is introduced. The existence of solutions to the $L_p$ Minkowski problem for log-concave functions is obtained for $p>1$ under some mild conditions on the pre-given Borel measures.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.