Abstract
Experiments reveal that the superconductors , and undergo two superconducting transitions in the absence of an applied magnetic field. The prevalence of these multiple transitions suggests a common underlying mechanism. A natural candidate theory which accounts for these two transitions is the existence of a small symmetry breaking field, however such a field has not been observed in or and has been called into question for . Motivated by arguments originally developed for superfluid we propose that a generalized spin fluctuation feedback effect is responsible for these two transitions. We first develop a phenomenological theory for that couples spin fluctuations to superfluidity, which correctly predicts that a high temperature broken time-reversal superfluid phase can emerge as a consequence. The transition at lower temperatures into a time-reversal invariant superfluid phase must then be first order by symmetry arguments. We then apply this phenomenological approach to the three superconductors , and revealing that this naturally leads to a high-temperature time-reversal invariant nematic superconducting phase, which can be followed by a second order phase transition into a broken time-reversal symmetry phase, as observed.
Connections
Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.
Building this map preview
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.
Reviews 0
Write a review
No reviews yet.
Discussion 0
Add a comment
No comments yet.