Generalized Spin Fluctuation Feedback In Correlated Fermion Superconductors

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Abstract

Experiments reveal that the superconductors UPt3\text{UPt}_3, U1−xThxBe13\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13} and PrOs4Sb12\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12} undergo two superconducting transitions in the absence of an applied magnetic field. The prevalence of these multiple transitions suggests a common underlying mechanism. A natural candidate theory which accounts for these two transitions is the existence of a small symmetry breaking field, however such a field has not been observed in PrOs4Sb12\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12} or U1−xThxBe13\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13} and has been called into question for UPt3\text{UPt}_3. Motivated by arguments originally developed for superfluid 3He^3\text{He} we propose that a generalized spin fluctuation feedback effect is responsible for these two transitions. We first develop a phenomenological theory for 3He^3\text{He} that couples spin fluctuations to superfluidity, which correctly predicts that a high temperature broken time-reversal superfluid 3He^3\text{He} phase can emerge as a consequence. The transition at lower temperatures into a time-reversal invariant superfluid phase must then be first order by symmetry arguments. We then apply this phenomenological approach to the three superconductors UPt3\text{UPt}_3, U1−xThxBe13\text{U}_{1-x}\text{Th}_x\text{Be}_{13} and PrOs4Sb12\text{PrOs}_4\text{Sb}_{12} revealing that this naturally leads to a high-temperature time-reversal invariant nematic superconducting phase, which can be followed by a second order phase transition into a broken time-reversal symmetry phase, as observed.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.