Paper detail

General Analysis of B -> K^(*) l^+ l^- Decays at Low Recoil

We analyze the angular distributions of B -> K^* (-> K pi) l^+ l^- and B -> K l^+ l^- decays in the region of low hadronic recoil in a model-independent way by taking into account the complete set of dimension-six operators [sbar Gamma b][lbar Gamma' l]. We obtain several novel low-recoil observables with high sensitivity to non-standard-model Dirac structures, including CP-asymmetries which do not require flavor tagging. The transversity observables H_T^(1,3,4,5) are found to be insensitive to hadronic matrix elements and their uncertainties even when considering the complete set of operators. In the most general scenario we show that the low recoil operator product expansion can be probed at the few-percent level using the angular observable J_7. Higher sensitivities are possible assuming no tensor contributions, specifically by testing the low-recoil relation |H_T^(1)|=1. We explicitly demonstrate the gain in reach of the low-recoil observables in accessing the ratio |C_9/C_10| compared to the forward-backward asymmetry, and probing CP-violating right-handed currents Im C_10'. We give updated Standard Model predictions for key observables in B -> K^(*) l^+ l^- decays.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.