Paper detail

GeMSE: a Low-Background Facility for Gamma-Spectrometry at Moderate Rock Overburden

The GeMSE (Germanium Material and meteorite Screening Experiment) facility operates a low-background HPGe crystal in an underground laboratory with a moderate rock overburden of 620$\,$m.w.e. in Switzerland. It has been optimized for continuous remote operation. A multi-layer passive shielding, a muon veto, and a boil-off nitrogen purge line inside the measurement cavity minimize the instrument's background rate, which decreased by 33% to (164$\pm$2)$\,$counts/day (100-2700$\,$keV) after five years of underground operation. This agrees with the prediction based on the expected decay of short-lived isotopes. A fit to the known background components, modeled via a precise simulation of the detector, shows that the GeMSE background is now muon-dominated. We also present updates towards a more accurate detection efficiency calculation for the screened samples: the thickness of the crystal's outer dead-layer is precisely determined and the efficiency can now be easily calculated for any sample geometry. The advantage of this feature is showcased via the determination of the $^{40}$K content in the screening of a complex-shaped object: a banana.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.