Paper detail

Gaussian Process Regression with Location Errors

In this paper, we investigate Gaussian process regression models where inputs are subject to measurement error. In spatial statistics, input measurement errors occur when the geographical locations of observed data are not known exactly. Such sources of error are not special cases of "nugget" or microscale variation, and require alternative methods for both interpolation and parameter estimation. Gaussian process models do not straightforwardly extend to incorporate input measurement error, and simply ignoring noise in the input space can lead to poor performance for both prediction and parameter inference. We review and extend existing theory on prediction and estimation in the presence of location errors, and show that ignoring location errors may lead to Kriging that is not "self-efficient". We also introduce a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) approach using the Hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm that obtains optimal (minimum MSE) predictions, and discuss situations that lead to multimodality of the target distribution and/or poor chain mixing. Through simulation study and analysis of global air temperature data, we show that appropriate methods for incorporating location measurement error are essential to valid inference in this regime.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.