Paper detail

Further evaluation of a THGEM UV-photon detector for RICH - comparison with MWPC

The operation of single-, double- and triple-THGEM UV-detectors with reflective CsI photocathodes (CsI-THGEM) in Ne/CH4 and Ne/CF4 mixtures was investigated in view of their potential applications in RICH. The studies were carried out with UV, x-rays and β-electrons and focused on the maximum achievable gain, discharge probability, cathode excitation effects and long-term gain stability. Comparative studies under similar conditions were made in CH4, CF4 and Ne/CF4, with a MWPC coupled to a reflective CsI photocathode (CsI-MWPC). It was found that at counting rates <= 10 Hz/mm^2 the maximum achievable gain of CsI-THGEMs is determined by the Raether limit; at counting rates > 10 Hz/mm^2 it dropped with rate. In all cases investigated the attainable CsI-THGEM gain was significantly higher than that of the CsI-MWPC, under similar conditions. Furthermore, the CsI-THGEM UV-detector suffered fewer cathode-excitation induced effects as compared to CsI-MWPC and had better stability at high counting rates.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.