Paper detail

From Boltzmann-Gibbs ensemble to generalized ensembles

We reconsider the Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical ensemble in thermodynamics using the multinomial coefficient approach. We show that an ensemble is defined by the determination of four statistical quantities, the element probabilities $p_i$, the configuration probabilities $P_j$, the entropy $S$ and the extremum constraints (EC). This distinction is of central importance for the understanding of the conditions under which a microcanonical, canonical and macrocanonical ensemble is defined. These three ensembles are characterized by the conservation of their sizes. A variation of the ensemble size creates difficulties in the definitions of the quadruplet $\{p_i, P_j, S, \mt{EC}\}$, giving rise for a generalization of the Boltzmann-Gibbs formalism, such one as introduced by Tsallis. We demonstrate that generalized thermodynamics represent a transformation of ordinary thermodynamics in such a way that the energy of the system remains conserved. From our results it becomes evident that Tsallis's formalism is a very specific generalization, however, not the only one. We also revisit the Jaynes's Maximum Entropy Principle, showing that in general it can lead to incorrect results and consider the appropriate corrections.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.