BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Thomas Oikonomou

Thomas Oikonomou contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.stat-mech

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Clausius vs. Boltzmann-Gibbs entropies

In this work, we demonstrate the inappropriateness of the Boltzmann-Gibbs log-formulation of the physical Clausius entropy $S$ in connecting thermodynamics and phase space statistics. To achieve our goal, we study thermodynamically the simple case of ideal gases embedded in a finite heat bath and compare the derived equations with the phase space statistical ones obtained within the canonical ensemble. We then show that the results of the aforementioned approaches contradict to each other even in the dilute gas limit (infinite heat bath) if we request the identification of the Boltmann-Gibbs formula $\ln(Density\,\, of\,\, States)$ with the thermodynamic entropy $S$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Reply to M. Campisi [arXiv: 1310.5556]

In response to M. Campisi's comment [arXiv: 1310.5556] on our recent work [Phys. Rev. E 88, 042126 (2013)], we first point out that the distribution used by Campisi is not the correct escort distribution and further provide arguments showing that the distributions obtained from the finite bath scenario are not Tsallis distributions assuming the ergodicity of the total system. We also comment on the role of evidence mentioned by M. Campisi.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Clausius versus Sackur-Tetrode entropies

Based on the property of extensivity (mathematically, homogeneity of first degree), we derive in a mathematically consistent manner the explicit expressions of the chemical potential $μ$ and the Clausius entropy $S$ for the case of monoatomic ideal gases in open systems within phenomenological thermodynamics. Neither information theoretic nor quantum mechanical statistical concepts are invoked in this derivation. Considering a specific expression of the constant term of $S$, the derived entropy coincides with the Sackur-Tetrode entropy in the thermodynamic limit. We demonstrate however, that the former limit is not contained in the classical thermodynamic relations, implying that the usual resolutions of Gibbs paradox do not succeed in bridging the gap between the thermodynamics and statistical mechanics. We finally consider the volume of the phase space as an entropic measure, albeit, without invoking the thermodynamic limit to investigate its relation to the thermodynamic equation of state and observables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Do Tsallis distributions really originate from the finite baths?

It is often stated that heat baths with finite degrees of freedom i.e., finite baths, are sources of Tsallis distributions for the classical Hamiltonian systems. By using well-known fundamental statistical mechanical expressions, we rigorously show that Tsallis distributions with fat tails are possible \textit{only} for finite baths with constant negative heat capacity while constant positive heat capacity finite baths yield decays with sharp cut-off with no fat tails. However, the correspondence between Tsallis distributions and finite baths holds at the expense of violating equipartition theorem for finite classical systems at equilibrium. Finally, we comment on the implications of the finite bath for the recent attempts towards a $q$-generalized central limit theorem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

From Boltzmann-Gibbs ensemble to generalized ensembles

We reconsider the Boltzmann-Gibbs statistical ensemble in thermodynamics using the multinomial coefficient approach. We show that an ensemble is defined by the determination of four statistical quantities, the element probabilities $p_i$, the configuration probabilities $P_j$, the entropy $S$ and the extremum constraints (EC). This distinction is of central importance for the understanding of the conditions under which a microcanonical, canonical and macrocanonical ensemble is defined. These three ensembles are characterized by the conservation of their sizes. A variation of the ensemble size creates difficulties in the definitions of the quadruplet $\{p_i, P_j, S, \mt{EC}\}$, giving rise for a generalization of the Boltzmann-Gibbs formalism, such one as introduced by Tsallis. We demonstrate that generalized thermodynamics represent a transformation of ordinary thermodynamics in such a way that the energy of the system remains conserved. From our results it becomes evident that Tsallis's formalism is a very specific generalization, however, not the only one. We also revisit the Jaynes's Maximum Entropy Principle, showing that in general it can lead to incorrect results and consider the appropriate corrections.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Comment on "Critique of multinomial coefficient method for evaluating Tsallis and Renyi entropies" by A.S. Parvan

Parvan [arXiv:0911.0383v1] [1] has recently presented some calculations in order to demonstrate the incorrectness of the results obtained from the generalized multinomial coefficients (GMC) presented in Ref. [2]. According to Parvan, the aforementioned approach of studying maximum entropy probability distributions is erroneous. In this comment I demonstrate that Parvan's arguments do not hold true and that the obtained results from GMC do not present either mathematical or physical discrepancies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Comment on "Essential discreteness in generalized thermostatistics with non-logarithmic entropy" by S. Abe

Recently Abe (arXiv:cond-mat/1005.5110v1) claimed that the q-entropy of nonextensive statistical mechanics cannot be generalized for the continuous variables and therefore can be used only in the discrete case. In this letter, we show that the discrete q-entropy can be generalized to continuous variables exactly in the same manner as Boltzmann-Gibbs entropy, contrary to the claim by Abe, so that q-entropy can be used with discrete as well as continuous variables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access