Paper detail

Flavor Changing Neutral Currents involving Heavy Quarks with Four Generations

We study various FCNC involving heavy quarks in the Standard Model (SM) with a sequential fourth generation. After imposing $B\to X_sγ$, $B\to X_sl^+l^-$ and $Z\to b\bar{b}$ constraints, we find ${\cal B}(Z\to s\bar{b}+\bar{s}b)$ can be enhanced by an order of magnitude to $10^{-7}$, while $t\to cZ, cH$ decays can reach $10^{-6}$, which are orders of magnitude higher than in SM. However,these rates are still not observable for the near future.With the era of LHC approaching, we focus on FCNC decays involving fourth generation $b^\prime$ and $t^\prime$ quarks. We calculate the rates for loop induced FCNC decays $b^\prime\to bZ, bH, bg, bγ$, as well as $t^\prime\to tZ,\tH, tg, tγ$. If $|V_{cb'}|$ is of order $|V_{cb}| \simeq 0.04$, tree level $b^\prime\to cW$ decay would dominate, posing a challenge since $b$-tagging is less effective. For $|V_{cb'}| \ll |V_{cb}|$, $b'\to tW$ would tend to dominate, while $b'\to t^\prime W^*$ could also open for heavier $b'$, leading to thepossibility of quadruple-$W$ signals via $b'\bar b'\to b\bar b W^+W^-W^+W^-$. The FCNC $b'\to bZ, bH$ decays could still dominate if $m_{b'}$ is just above 200 GeV. For the case of $t'$, ingeneral $t^\prime\to bW$ would be dominant, hence it behaves like a heavy top. For both $b'$ and $t'$, except for the intriguing light $b'$ case, FCNC decays are in the $10^{-4} -10^{-2}$ range, and are quite detectable at the LHC.For a possible future ILC, we find the associated production of FCNC $e^+e^-\to b\bar s$, $t\bar c$ are below sensitivity, while $e^+e^-\to b^\prime\bar b$ and$t^\prime\bar t$ can be better probed.Tevatron Run-II can still probe the lighter $b'$ or $t'$ scenario. LHC would either discover the fourth generation and measure the FCNC rates, or rule out the fourth generation conclusively.

preprint2006arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.